Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Welcome to the Chaucer's Influence on Fifteenth-Century Scottish Literature mini wiki at Scratchpad!
You can use the box below to create new pages for this mini-wiki. Make sure you type
[[Category:Chaucer's Influence on Fifteenth-Century Scottish Literature]] on the page before you save it to make it part of the Chaucer's Influence on Fifteenth-Century Scottish Literature wiki (preload can be enabled to automate this task, by clicking this link and saving that page. Afterwards, you may need to purge this page, if you still see this message).
In the fifteenth century, the first phase of Scottish “Chaucerianism” began with King James I of Scotland. The second phase quickly followed with Robert Henryson, William Dunbar, and Gavin Douglas. At this point, England has recognized Scotland as an independent nation following the end of the Wars of Scottish Independence in 1357. Because of Scottish history and the English’s recent involvement in that history, all of these writers are familiar with the works of Geoffrey Chaucer.
Phases of Scottish Chaucerianism
The first phase of Scottish Chaucerianism
James I and his work The Kingis Quair represent the first phase of Chaucerianism, which purposefully and directly imitates the works of Chaucer while preserving the Scottish author’s own uniqueness.
The second phase of Scottish Chaucerianism
The poems Robert Henryson, William Dunbar, and Gavin Douglas represent the second phase of Chaucerianism, a more academic one, which adapts Chaucer’s style to the authors’ more individual and nationalistic purposes.
Not Just “Scottish Chaucerians”
The fifteenth century is a time of experimentation and “play” with poetry. The fifteenth-century poets often attempt to generate new meaning from previous poetry by picking apart the old in order to mold it into something new. Such is the relationship between the so-called Scottish “Chaucerians” and Geoffrey Chaucer himself.
To say Geoffrey Chaucer is the singular influence on these Scottish poets is a definite over-generalization. These poets share in the medieval status of Chaucer, and Chaucer is their immediate predecessor, but the poems retain the distinctiveness of the Scottish authors and traditions. As time continues on in the fifteenth century, the authors move further and further away from direct similarity with Chaucer. For the fifteenth-century Scottish poets Chaucer lends an important model, but they use that model for their own purposes.
James I of Scotland (1394-1437)
King James I of Scotland wrote The Kingis Quair, a series of courtly love poems written in rhyme-royal stanzas. This poem is not merely a conventional application of Chaucer’s courtly writing. It also introduces to Scottish literature the discourse of subjectivity, in which the first person is the subject of the poem. The King writes this poem as a sort of autobiography about his experiences in English captivity. Although James I is willing to build on the styles of the English Chaucer, his writing reflects the beginnings of a Scottish national identity.
Robert Henryson (c.1425-c.1500)
Although there are many similarities between the subject matter and refinement of verse in Chaucer and Henryson, the latter poet transcends literary imitation and brings his own Scottish nationalism into his writing. Henryson’s work concentrates on more local issues in Scotland, which gives his work a more “popular” quality than Chaucer’s. He is also famous being one of the first to write in the idiom that later comes to be known as Scots.
One of Henryson’s greatest achievements is his work The Testament of Cresseid, a critical re-writing of Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. Henryson disregards Chaucer’s conclusion and creates a totally new ending where Troilus is kept alive to permit one final encounter with his lover, who has been reduced to leprosy.
William Dunbar (c. 1460-c.1520)
As Dunbar belongs to the latest medieval phase, his work is quite far from that of Chaucer’s. Although Dunbar’s The Tretis includes many ironic gestures that recall the Wife of Bath and The Merchant’s Tale, he utilizes a much wilder humor than Chaucer. Dunbar is even credited with the first printed use of the word “fuck.” He does not utilize the Chaucerian palinode, or retraction.
Gavin Douglas (c.1474-1522)
Douglas’s The Palace of Honour is loosely modeled on Chaucer’s The House of Fame. Like Chaucer’s work, this poem recounts the progress of the dreaming poet’s education, which culminates in a journey to a celestial place. Douglas carries on Chaucerian allegory, but concentrates heavily on cultural nationalism.
His most famous work is his translation of Vergil’s the Aeneid, Eneados. The Eneados is the first translation of the entire Aeneid into an English dialect, ‘Scottis.’ Douglas uses this to distance himself from Chaucer’s translation of the same text and also detaches himself from Chaucer by assuming the cultural authority of Vergil as his miglior fabbro, or greater craftsman, not Chaucer.
Burrow, J.A. "Henryson: the Preaching of the Swallow." Essays on Medieval Literature.
- Oxford: Claredon P, 1984. 148-160.
Fradenburg, Louise O. "The Scottish Chaucer." Writing After Chaucer: Essential
- Readings in Chaucer and the Fifteenth Century. Ed. Daniel J. Pinti. New York:
- Garland, 1998. 167-176.
Goldstein, James R. "Writing in Scotland." The Cambridge History of Medieval English
- Literature. Cambrigdge: Cambridge UP, 1999. 237-254.
Ridley, Florence H. "Middle Scots Writers." A Manual of the Writings in Middle
- English. Ed. Albert E. Hartung. Vol. 4. New Haven: The Connecticut
- Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1973. 961-1060.
Smith, G. Gregory. "The Scottish Chaucerians." The Cambridge History of English and
- American Literature: An Encyclopedia in Eighteen Volumes. Ed. A. W. Ward and
- A. R. Waller. Jan. 2000. Bartleby.Com.14 Mar. 2008. <http://www.bartleby.com/212/1001.html>.
Speirs, John. The Scots Literary Tradition. London: Chatto & Windus, 1940. 3-67.
You include a lot of content with excellent structure. You need to include more internal bibliography citations especially in the section on "Not Just Scottish Chaucerians" because it sounds too scholarly. Also more internal or external citations within the wikipedia article could be implemented for further background information. Letter Grade: A
Very detailed entry. Broader topics tend to have fewer specific details, but this is great. Also good structure and organization. Nice job. A.
Excellent. The formatting is wonderful, the information is detailed enough for an encyclopedia entry and makes for a great summary of what you wanted to get across. A
This is a wonderful introduction to this topic and definitely captures the feel of an encyclopedia entry. The break up of the topics makes it very easy to follow for readers unfamiliar with the topic. Just be careful about switching tenses from present to past. A.
This is a very professional looking article. Great use of the contents table, good headings, and very informative. Grade: A