EvolutionDiscussion
From Scratchpad
AristotlePragmatics , ChomskyPragmatics , MujinPragmatics , ErnestMajorPragmatics ,
Contents |
[edit] D
DaveScotPragmatics , StruggleForLife
BerlinskiPragmatics,HersheyPragmatics , GordonRattrayTaylorPragmatics, GeoffPragmatics
KingsolverOnNaturalSelection , KennethMillerPragmatics
KampisPragmatics , JerryCoynePragmatics , HarshmanPragmatics
TheoryOfGradualEvolution , SapolskyPragmatics
TdToneNaturalSelection1 , ChrisColbyPragmatics
ReproductiveSuccess, PzMyersPragmatics, RusePragmatics , NicholasHumphreyPragmatics
[edit] F
[edit] T
TimberwoofPragmatics , TimTyler, PerryMarshall
[edit] U
MechanismEvolution , MarcelSchutz
- Humphreys: "... NS is a conjuring trick..."
- Gould: ".... the mind consists of illusions ..."
- Timberwoof: "... NS is a handy label ... and refuse to proceed to any deeper understanding..."
- Harshman1:"... NS is a cause ...."
- Harshman2:".... NS is an effect ...."
- Harshman3:".... NS can be both a cause or an effect...."
- Harshman4:".... ToE is difficult to define ...."
- Dawkins: "... NS produced everything in the universe and precedes design but I can't prove it but believe it ..."
- Chomsky1: "... saying that NS produces something is extremely sloppy language...."
- Chomsky2: " .... NS can't explain where language came from ...."
- Pinker: ".... NS is all we have what other explanation could there be ...."
- Darwin:"... NS is a force incessantly ready for action ....."
- ChrisColbyPragmatics: "... NS can only be an effect ..." What is the cause then ?
- Wilkins:".... ordinary language is not suited to discussing selection in evolution ..."
- BerlinskiPragmatics: "... NS as some sort of universal mechanism is just as impossible as a single differential equation explaining all of physics...."
- JerryCoynePragmatics: "....Humans are the product of non-random NS ...."
- Coyne1: ".... NS produces order ...."
- Fox priest Johnathin:".... NS is random ...."
- GordonRattrayTaylorPragmatics:"... NS is random ..."
- KingsolverOnNaturalSelection: ".... it explains everything ..."
- BerlinksiPragmatics: ".... theories that explain everything explain nothing, their control of the facts is an illusion..."
- KennethMillerPragmatics: "....with natural selection pushing or pulling or splitting, species can change over time. ...." Thus NS actually does something and it is a cause ?
- Miller2: "....natural selection does have to work gradually.." Is NS a cause or an effect ?
- Miller3: "...NS is blind...." Why is NS never stupid ?
- WilliamProvinePragmatics:"...Natural selection does not act on anything..."
- Williamprovine1:"...It doesn't select for or against nor pull or push anything. Natural selection does nothing..."
- SparkNotesPragmatics:"...As far as NS is concerned survival alone isn't enough..." Says who ?
- MarcelSchtutz:"....stability is a necessary condition for the existence of NS ..."
- PzMyersPragmatics:"..We are not dealing with "Darwin's theory" anymore....It was a preliminary proposal published in 1859.."
- KermitPragmatics:"...Current ideas do not depend on how Darwin used or defined terms...."
- HersheyPragmatics:"... RS2-RS1 = NS ..."
- KampisPragmatics:".... Darwinism is not defined ...."
- RusePragmatics:".... Darwinism is the mechanism accepted by 90% of evolutionists ...."
